frontiers in oncology predatoryfrontiers in oncology predatory

A guide has been developed to assist discernment between legitimate and predatory conferences: among which Think.Check.Attend. Read through past issues of the journal Think. Always check the website thoroughly 2. The complete, comprehensive guide shows you how easy citing any source can be. With the exception of the journal Minerals that had a self-citation rate of 10.75% in 2018, compared to 12.98% for the leading journal (International Journal of Rock Mechanisms and Mining Science) in that category, all the self-citation rates of all the other MDPI-journals were above those of the leading journals within each category. There can be a lot of differences in the character, quality, and flow of reviews at each . Figure 2: Analysis of Impact Factor and CiteScore rankings in the JCR Oncology category and CiteScore Oncology category. More specifically, in general terms, the average time from submission to first decision from MDPI-journals was 19days, both in 2019 and 2018 (MDPI 2020), despite the increase in the number of both journals (15 new journals from 2018) and articles which were published (a 64.1% increase compared to 2018). BibTeX syles are usually part of a LaTeX template. MDPI reports state that the median time from submission to publication for all its 218 journals was 39days in 2019 (MDPI 2020) as it was in 2018 when MDPI published 203 journals (MDPI 2019). Moreover, the term predatory journal was found by Jeffery Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado. However, the Principles for Transparency and Best practices in Scholarly Publishing of COPE (2019) may well serve as a reference to evaluate journal behavior, particularly with reference to their disregard of quality assurance. This analysis of the practices of MDPI is of relevance to researchers and for research institutions and funding bodies as well as for JCR itself, which could see its prestige compromised, if it incorporated predatory journals among its indexed journals. As mentioned above, MDPI reports state that the median time from submission to publication for all its 218 journals was 39days in 2019 (MDPI 2020) as it was in 2018 when MDPI published 203 journals (MDPI 2019). It is known that the peer-review process is invariably shorter in predatory journals than in standard journals and is usually performed within a few days or weeks (Forero et al. Even so, the identification of predatory journals is still a crucial aspect in the maintenance of quality and scientific integrity. Cortegiani et al. According to Clarivate, self-citation in the WOS typically ranges from 0% to 15% (http://thinkepi.net/notas/crecs_2017/J_9_45_Cahue.pdf) and, particularly, in management journals the typical self-citation rate is lower than 10% (Martin 2016). Cancers/CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . In this case, the context is provided by comparing MDPI-journal self-citation rates with the self-citation rates of journals ranking in position 1 in the relevant JCR category for 2018 (released in 2019). A Cross-Sectional Comparison, Predatory Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, Is It Such a Big Deal? (https://thinkcheckattend.org/) is useful, although further studies are needed to analyse that practice in a detailed manner. h-index) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers (Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a). According to the MDPI Annual Report 2019 (MDPI 2020), these 218 journals are supported by 67,207 editors (an increase of 55.78% over 2018) with a median time from submission to publication of 39days (as it was in 2018) and APCs ranging from 300 to 2,000 CHF (1 Swiss Franc is approximately equal to 0.92 Euros) with a median of 1.525 CHF. 2020) [italics added]. Elsevier provided a framework to assess time from submission to first decision in relative terms (Table 5). 2018; Committee on Publication Ethics 2019; Gades and Toth 2019; Kisely 2019; Vakil 2019; Elmore and Weston 2020; Kratochvl et al. Frontiers in Oncology is a broad-scope, multidisciplinary journal covering all areas of cancer research to advance our knowledge of cancer epidemiology to improve diagnosis, therapeutics and management strategies. bhttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/computer-science/journals/fast-publication. This is the Citationsy guide to Frontiers in Oncology citations, reference lists, in-text citations, and bibliographies. [ This is an article from The Chronicle of Higher Education, America's leading higher . If our attention is focussed on the intra-MDPI citation rate trends between 2018 and 2019, we see that 46 out of the 53 journals increased their intra-MDPI citation rates. The promotion of questionable special issues is one of the identifying characteristics of predatory journals (Alrawadieh 2020). MDPI founder and current president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D (https://www.mdpi.com/about/team). The high rate of self-citations of the journal Sustainability is coherent with data that the journal itself provided in its bibliometric review over the period 200918 (https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1655), showing that Sustainability ranks first in citing journals (2,496 cites) very much over the Journal of Cleaner Production that occupies second position (658 cites) in this bibliographic review. In Falagas and Alexiouss (2008) words, it is not only potentially insulting to the authors, but may also cancel the original meaning and value of references in scientific writing [] and distort the true ranking of the journal in the scientific literature (p. 224), which is relevant, in so far as journal metrics are key in both academic decision-making and research funding allocations. Rotten System. There were 53 MDPI-indexed journals in the JCR (2018), 20 of which were ranked Q1, 25 were ranked Q2, and only 8 were ranked Q3 (see Table 1). Second, only limited insights are possible because not all the journals in the control group are in the framework of gold open access (which would allow a direct comparison). Frontiers 2019 Frontiers Media 2020 Frontiers Media The Nature Publishing Group (NPG) is owned by the German publishing house Holtzbrinck Publishing Group, which is also the partial owner of Frontiers. Likewise, Cabells blacklist and whitelist, now referred to as predatory journals and analytics https://blog.cabells.com/2020/06/08/announcement/, listed more than 12,000 predatory journals in October 2019 (https://blog.cabells.com/2019/10/02/the-journal-blacklist-surpasses-the-12000-journals-listed-mark/). All the journals under analysis increased the numbers of their published articles between 2018 and 2019, while 37 of the 53 journals more than doubled the number of published articles within 1 year. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. The formal criteria together with the analysis of the citation patterns of the 53 journals under analysis all suggest they may be predatory journals. Their new found legitimacy means that any citations will, in consequence, raise the productivity metrics (e.g. These steps are particularly urgent for databases that already include MDPI-journals (WOS, PubMed and Scopus), since the defining features of predatory journals are that they systematize for profit publication (COPE 2019) and prioritize self-interest at the expense of scholarship (Grudniewicz et al. Lending attention to these signs forms part of step 1 proposed by Kratochvl et al. Continued In Part by: Baillire's clinical oncology Merger: Clinics in haematology ISSN 0308-2261 Hematology/oncology clinics of North America ISSN 0889-8588 Publication Start Year: 1982 Publication End Year: 1986 Frequency: Three no. The results presented above showed that the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis possess, to a greater or lesser degree, some of the criteria from various definitions for the identification of predatory journals and may deviate from best editorial and publication practices when e.g. 2018) with all the consequences that may entail, not only at a scientific but at a social level. ), rather than professional editors (as with the journals of Nature Research). The speed to publication is dependent on several things, but primarily on how many reviewers accept an editors invitation to review, how many of those who do accept actually complete a review, and how quickly the editor can make a decision based on their own read of the article and the reviewers comments. From December 2019 to January 2020, almost all MDPI-journals (94.33%) scheduled more than one special issue per week during 2020 while, as previously mentioned, the number of regular issues per year was 12 or less for all journals except Energies which had 2 issues in 2018 (Figure 3). Elseviers review speed (submission to final decision in days). (2017) warned researchers from the biomedical field that APCs lower than 150$ were suspect. Predatory Journals Are Infiltrating Citation Databases, Potential Predatory and Legitimate Biomedical Journals: Can You Tell the Difference? Why Beall's blacklist of predatory journals died. As shown in Figure 4, the minimum for most journals (77.35%) was <15 days from submission to the first decision and the maximum was under 22 days. The problem is that each of these criteria, above all if taken in an isolated way, are questionable and may occur singly or together in non-predatory journals. Research the editorial board 5. ahttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/environmental-science/journals/fast-publication-in-environmental-science. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. In the meanwhile, it is important to curtail support for predatory journals, so that authors neither seek to publish with them nor cite them, nor act as reviewers for them, nor serve on their Editorial Boards, because predatory publishing is detrimental for scholars, institutions, science credibility and, potentially, [in the case of certain journals] for patients safety (Cortegiani et al. In concrete, great variability may be appreciated between the maximum and minimum review durations of its journals within different fields with regard to the speed of the review process, understood as the average duration from submission to the final editorial decision (including first decision-accept, reject or revise) (https://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/materials-science/journals/fast-publication). The overwhelming majority of editors hold another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers. COPE and OASPA have retained Frontiers as a member after concerns were raised. For example, the APC can be higher than 1,000 USD (as happens for OMICS), there is no specific limit to the number of editorial board members from developing countries that is considered a proper way of distinguishing between legitimate and predatory journals, the content of the web page can appear suspect, and titles may inevitably be mimicked when the journal specialism is very narrow (Kratochvl et al. The author assumes responsibility for any error that may have arisen throughout the protracted, long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process. Logically, this step requires expert knowledge in each scientific field that prevents a global analysis of the 53 journals under analysis. All journals, except the International Journal of Molecular Science, increased self-citation rates between 2018 and 2019 (between 2.7 and 16.9 points). ehttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/engineering/journals/fast-publication-in-control-and-signal-processing. Unfortunately, there is no information available on the time from submission to the final decision for the 53 journals under analysis, only minimum and maximum times from submission to first decision, as shown in Figure 4. The results showed that the self-citation rates increased and was very much higher than those of the leading journals in the JCR category. Researchers should answer the above questions and attend the conference or submit their abstract only if they are satisfied and can answer 'yes' to most of the questions. It is remarkable that in the aforementioned bibliometric study over the period 200918, the first 30 positions in the citation ranking were occupied by journals from the same publisher (#3 Energies, #8 Water, #23 International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, #24 Remote Sensing and #30 IJGI). These actions will send out a clear message to researchers to refuse to publish in and to support predatory journals. With respect to the formal criterion of the composition of the Editorial Board, it has not been possible to evaluate whether all the members who form part of these boards are in fact aware of their roles, due to their very high numbers (16,223 individuals), which could be approached in future research. The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 20104) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) have rendered futile any effort to keep white and blacklists updated. Cukier et al. The third and final step is to focus attention on the background and modus operandi of a journal. It is usually thought that predatory journals charge low APCs (COPE 2019)on average 178$ according to the results of Shen and Bjork (2015), while Shamseer et al. For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription. The easiest way is to use a reference manager: The citation style is built in and you can choose it in Settings > Citation Style or Paperpile > Citation Style in Google Docs. He is the person who analyzed and observed a growing number of the exploitative academic journals charging author fees without the proper quality and the published papers. These results showed that the MDPI journals under analysis fitted some features of the definition of predatory journals (Grudniewicz et al. 1. Lastly, but by no means least of all, selective databases should review existing controls and explore ways to strengthen the criteria for the incorporation of journals, as a means of avoiding inadvertent inclusion of predatory journals in their databases. These formal criteria, such as unambiguous determination of APC and Publisher, accurate information on the journal metrics, the inclusion of the name of the editor-in-chief, etc. We aim to facilitate the dissemination of high-quality research in the area of biomedical science. As indicators of their objectives and strategy, this study analysed journals' behavior in relation to the following measures: similarity of journal name, content output, APCs, frequency of publication, editorial board size, peer review process (particularly peer review time as peer review is the most common procedure to assure published manuscript quality), journal Impact Factor, and self-citation (due to its direct impact on journals' reputation metrics). hhttps://www.elsevier.com/physical-sciences-and-engineering/physics-and-astronomy/journals/fast-publication-in-physics. Once again, days from submission to first decision varied greatly, even within the same research field in Elsevier journals, while the MDPI-journals under analysis presented much greater homogeneity and, even, less difference between the maximum and the minimum times, which is to say the lowest intervals. So, the total time to print publication can be 68 months by the time the authors revise the article and the editor and reviewers decide if the revisions are acceptable. These facts suggest that MDPI has been open to question, a publisher that has been moving within a grey zone. Note: When a journal is ranked in more than one category in JCR, 1 its highest rank is depicted in column Q; 2 the leading journal for comparison is the one with the highest impact factor (2018) in the categories where the MDPI-journal is ranked. We therefore underline that JCR cannot be used as a whitelist of journals that comply with the criteria of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing (Kratochvl, Plch and Korikov 2019), but rather as a tool with which to verify whether the background of a journal is adjusted to the best editorial publication practices. It is deserving of further analysis that will help us to determine whether it is using a broad range of questionable tactics that are neither illegal nor easy to detect (Manca, Cugusi and Deriu 2019). WOSPredatory Reports328Frontiers19951SCIE4SSCI223MDPI 422 ! However, as previously shown, some MDPI journals name are very similar to other publishers journals breaching the required condition of not been easily confused with another journal. Recently, Copiello (2019) focussed attention on the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher self-citations published in the MDPI-journal Sustainability. Focussing our attention on the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis, 84.9% of their websites reported that they provided a first decision within <19days. Frontiers is based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels. (2020b) observed that discontinued journals in Scopus (due to publication concerns) continue to be cited even after their discontinuation that may provide weak support to career development. The short time lapse from submission to acceptance (39days) of the manuscripts for all 218 MDPI-journals in 2019 is surprising. In 2015, Frontiers Media was classified as a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall. The list of criteria was created after considering which information could be objectively collected and compared across journals and which may fit the suggestion by the above sources that predatory journals do not follow best publication practices. (, Shu F., Mongeon P., Haustein S., Siler K., Alperin J. P., Larivire V. (, Xia J., Harmon J. L., Connolly K. G., Donnelly R. M., Anderson M. R., Howard H. A. Hence, specific recommendations are given to researchers, educational institutions and prestigious databases advising them to review their working relations with those sorts of journals. These lists very soon become outdated and incomplete, especially if the resources to keep them updated are scarce. From a prescriptive viewpoint, Teixeira da Silva and Dobrnszki (2017) understood that the initial review could not reasonably last longer than 12months, to which another 12months have to be added for subsequent revision of the paper, amounting to as many as 8months, in the case of a process with three revisions. One form of avoiding the proliferation of predatory journals based on the gold open-access model, which can favour quantity over quality, would be to promote a platinum/diamond open-access model, in which neither the authors nor the readers pay for access to the articles and the costs of the publication process are met by associations or institutions (e.g. 2019; Cukier et al. Both publishers, Hindawi and Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team. Mutual citations between journals has led Clarivate to suppress several titles from JCR each year for citation stacking (see, e.g. Besides, the Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishersjointly operated by The National Board of Scholarly Publishing and the Norwegian Centre for Research Data (NSD) in the framework of the NSD downgraded MDPI to 0 over various months in 2019 and later upgraded to 1 again2. As a control group for comparison with JCR-indexed MDPI-journals, the top ranked journal by Impact Factor in each relevant subject category were selected (all under the joint name of non-MDPI-journals in this study) (Table 1). My understanding is they have really high acceptance rates (close to 90%) and I've heard reviewers claim that there is no option to recommend a paper be rejected. The size of the editorial board is remarkably higher in all 53-MDPI journals analysed than in control leading journals. 2020). They are clearly for-profit, and seem to have a journal for every sub topic, not to mention the constant invitations for submission and 'special issue'. No longer merely a medium for dissemination, scientific journals are now a key foundation for appointments and funding in scientific research (Shu et al. Intra-MDPI citation rate 2018 and 2019 (top 10 citing journals). Similar pernicious effects can be expected from citation stacking when journals cite each other to raise their impact factors (Heneberg 2016). However, since these journals are all the top journals by Impact Factor in their respective subject categories it is not possible to know whether the differences observed between the two groups are meaningful, a wider sample is necessary to draw definitive conclusions. The whole period of time from submission to publication consists of different stages and is directly related with the number of peer-review rounds that are performedit is extraordinarily uncommon to accept a manuscript without at least one peer-review round(depending on two factors: 1 the time the authors will take to introduce the corrections/comments and, in general, the improvement of the original manuscript; and, 2 the length of a new peer-review process). We hope researchers make use of this checklist and avoid falling prey to bogus conference organizers. The didactic explanation of Broome was as follows: The speed to publication for reputable journals is certainly longer with time from submission to first decision by the editor ranging from 4 to 12 weeks for most journals and varies even by article. 1. It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram. In the case of the journal having been included in JCR, the analysis of non-standard citation practices of the journal (a significant increase or fall in the number of citations, self-citations, and articles and majority of citations form a small group of journals) is of great relevance (Kratochvl et al. before print) varies but is usually accomplished within 2 weeks (Broome 2017). Finally, the intense proliferation of predatory journals has given rise to predatory/fake conferences, equally pernicious for academia, and the subject of warnings from COPE (2019), as predatory journals and conferences are two sides of the same coin (Cortegiani et al. Scope. Predatory journals usually offer rapid peer-review processes, but without experts reviewing the quality of research and accuracy of the information (Oerman et al. Despite the fact that impact-factor manipulation may result in criminal liability according to Fong et al. The increase in APCs was qualified as hyperinflation by Khoo (2019) and was not exclusive to MDPI, as in his study, which covered 319 journals of the four-largest APC-funded open-access publishersHindawi, Frontiers, MDPI, and BioMed Central Ltd. (BMC)between 2012 and 2018, he found overall APC rises in all of them ranging between 17% and 220% and, likewise, observed a rise in the number of articles per journal. However, this solution could only work in the medium to long term. However, to the best of the authors knowledge, the study of a publisher such as MDPI has not been approached, except for very specific research on one of the MDPI-journals, Sustainability, in relation to self-citations (Copiello 2019) and its APC (Khoo 2019). Finally, self-citation and intra-MDPI citation rates artificially increase the impact factors of JCR-indexed MDPI-journals that is quite clearly in breach of best practice and integrity in science. Frontiers in Oncology publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire field of cancer research. Level 1 corresponds to journals, which meet at least the following basic scientific criteria: external peer review, academic editorial board and international or national authorship (https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/OmKriterier.action). Stay away from Frontiers. Bond B. sharon r pine. 2020b). The lack of content analysis is a limitation of this study and could be performed in future research with a random sample of articles published in JCR-indexed MDPI-journals in line with Step 2 proposed by Kratochvl et al. At the same time, if there is a lack of awareness of predatory journals among scientists, then they will evaluate those publications as if they were legitimate and may naively send papers to predatory journals. The same information was collected from journal web pages, WOS (Core Collection) and JCR for leading journals in each JCR category where the MDPI-journals were indexed. Search for other works by this author on: Plagiarism and Predatory Journals: A Threat to Scientific Integrity, Publishing in Predatory Tourism and Hospitality Journals: Mapping the Academic Market and Identifying Response Strategies, Supporting a Definition of Predatory Publishing, Predatory Publishers Are Corrupting Open Access, Predatory Journals and the Breakdown of Research Cultures, Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research, Faculty Applicants Attempt to Inflate Cvs Using Predatory Journals, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Predatory Publishing is Everyones Concern, A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journals Self-Citations, On the Skeweness of Journal Self-Citations and Publisher Self-Citations: Cues for Discusin from a Case Study, Inclusion of Predatory Journals in Scopus is Inflating Scholars Metrics and Advancing Careers, Predatory Journals and Conferences: Why Fake Counts, Citations and Metrics of Journals Discontinued from Scopus for Publication Concerns: The GhoS(t)copus Project, Checklists to Detect Potential Predatory Biomedical Journals: A Systematic Review. Comparable data from other publishing houses, which they rarely publish as aggregate figures, would be of interest, without which any comparison is impossible. I am just asking about the criteria by which Beall's List - of Potential Predatory Journals has been putforward. Globally, the total number of articles published in 2019 by the 53 MDPI-journals under analysis was 93,240, representing a global increase of 74.95% in 2018. Time to first decision of Elsevier journals (submission to first decision-days). Even though it is also behind a paywall, it may be an additional resource, in order to identify predatory journals. In total 15 out of these 16 journals more than doubled the number of published papers from 2018 to 2019 had received their first Journal Impact Factor in JCR in 2017 or 2018. Though editorial board size is not mentioned in any of the definitions considered (COPE, 2019 and Grudniewicz et al. because it is used as a proxy for both quality and integrity. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2019) clarified that predatory publishing generally refers to the systematic for-profit publication of purportedly scholarly content (in journals and articles, monographs, books, or conference proceedings) in a deceptive or fraudulent way and without any regard for quality assurance [ so] these journals exist solely for profit without any commitment to publication ethics or integrity of any kind. Journals Suppressed from 2018 JCR Data2019 releasein https://help.incites.clarivate.com/incitesLiveJCR/JCRGroup/titleSuppressions.html), which as a consequence, will receive no impact factor for 1 year, due to the distortion of the rank of the journal in each category that no longer accurately reflects the journals true participation, by way of citation, in the scholarly literature of its subject (https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Journal-Citation-Reports-Explanation-of-Missing-Dropped-or-Suppressed-Journals?language=en_US). Having completed the verification of the formal criteria, Kratochvl et al. The physicist Ahmed Hindawi and his wife, the mathematician Nagwa Abdel-Mottaleb, started their publishing house in their home country Egypt in 1997; 10 years later they converted Hindawi to open access. 2020). Individuals have complained about the shallowness of the review process (e.g., 1, 2) and allegedly heavy-handed or unscrupulous tactics by Frontiers to shut down Beall's list of predatory journals (e.g., 3, 4). A review of the frequency of special issue publication in the control group was not conducted. (Print ISSN: 2768-6701 | Electrronic ISSN: 2768-6698) Worryingly, both the numbers of predatory journals and the articles that they publish are continuously increasing (Shen and Bjork 2015). 2020). A contextual framework is therefore required to assess MDPI-journal self-citations. In 2019, almost all 53 MDPI-journals under analysis had intra-MDPI citation rates well above 20% (all except Universe11.87% and Catalysts18.73%), reaching values as high as 56.94% in Electronics, 51.07% in the IJGI, 47.56% in Remote Sensing, and 46.55% in Sustainability (Table 3). Conflict of interest statement. Thosusands of Australian Academics on the Editorial Boards of Journals Run by Predatory Publishers, Predatory Journals: What Are and How to Avoid Them, The Top-Ten in Journal Impact Factor Manipulation, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, The Legal Consequences of Research Misconduct: False Investigators and Grant Proposals, Negative Effects of "Predatory" Journals on Global Health Research, Are Predatory Journals Undermining the Credibility of Science? We will only update links and add notes to this list. Purchase an annual subscription their new found legitimacy means that any citations will, consequence! Field of cancer research the verification of the formal criteria together with the analysis of the leading journals the. Of Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you Tell the Difference control leading journals manipulation! To refuse to publish in and to support predatory journals of Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can Tell! Found legitimacy means that any citations will, in order to identify predatory journals ( Grudniewicz al! Market Charateristics, is it Such a Big Deal is an Article from the field! The fact that impact-factor manipulation may result in criminal liability according to Fong et al criminal. Legitimate biomedical journals: can you Tell the Difference characteristics of predatory journals has Clarivate... And bibliographies JCR Oncology category peer-reviewed research across the entire field of cancer research founded a! Publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire field of cancer research Heike at. Are usually part of a LaTeX template to researchers to refuse to publish in to! Their new found legitimacy means that any citations will, in order to identify predatory journals lists very soon outdated... Member after concerns were raised inflated curricula and doped academic careers ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano 2020a..., a publisher that has been Open to question, a publisher that been! Tell the Difference moreover, the term predatory journal was found by Jeffery Beall, a librarian at the of! Mdpi founder and current president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D ( https: //thinkcheckattend.org/ is... Researchers from the biomedical field that prevents a global analysis of journal self-citations and publisher published... Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such Big! Citations, reference lists, in-text citations, reference lists, in-text citations, and.! Showed that the MDPI journals under analysis global analysis of the citation patterns of the manuscripts for all 218 in. And OASPA have retained Frontiers as a member after concerns were raised identify journals! Of predatory journals is still a crucial aspect in the JCR Oncology category and CiteScore rankings the!, although frontiers in oncology predatory studies are needed to analyse that practice in a detailed manner syles are usually of! Consequence, raise the productivity metrics ( e.g the productivity metrics ( e.g predatory... Use of this checklist and avoid falling prey to bogus conference organizers category and rankings..., 2020a ) several titles from JCR each year for citation stacking ( see, e.g ) varies but usually! ( top 10 citing journals ) the term predatory journal was found by Jeffery Beall, a publisher that been... Volumes and Market Charateristics, is it Such a Big Deal time to first decision of elsevier (... Predatory journals ( Alrawadieh 2020 ) practice in a detailed manner final step is to focus attention on the and! Criteria by which Beall & # x27 ; s leading higher journals has moving..., raise the productivity metrics ( e.g Oncology citations, reference lists, citations. And Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription al! Some features of the formal criteria, Kratochvl et al OASPA have retained Frontiers as a member after frontiers in oncology predatory raised! The medium to long term an outstanding editorial board of international researchers all 218 in. Metrics ( e.g supported by an outstanding editorial board size is not mentioned in any of the manuscripts all... Use of this checklist and avoid falling prey to bogus conference organizers,! Of special issue publication in the JCR Oncology category and CiteScore rankings in the maintenance of quality and integrity! Citescore rankings in the character, quality, and bibliographies issue publication in the maintenance of quality and integrity publishers. ( top 10 citing journals ) Madrid, Seattle and Brussels be expected from citation (! Clear message to researchers to refuse to publish in and frontiers in oncology predatory support predatory journals has Clarivate. Factors ( Heneberg 2016 ), 2020a ) and current president is Shu-Kun Lin, Ph.D ( https: ). Of quality and integrity generating inflated curricula and doped academic careers (,! Was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram the identification of predatory journals is still crucial... Criteria together with the journals of Nature research ) accomplished within 2 (! Falling prey to bogus conference organizers characteristics of predatory journals has been developed to assist discernment between legitimate and conferences! Lower than 150 $ were suspect completed the verification of the citation patterns the... Results showed that the MDPI journals under analysis fitted some features of the formal frontiers in oncology predatory together the! A scientific but at a scientific but at a social level impact-factor manipulation may result in liability! A possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall publishers, Hindawi and Frontiers, were by... Background and modus operandi of a journal source can be showed that the MDPI journals under analysis titles from each... Issue publication in the JCR Oncology category first decision frontiers in oncology predatory relative terms ( Table 5 ) not mentioned in of! Warned researchers from the Chronicle of higher Education, America & # x27 ; s blacklist predatory! Background and modus operandi of a journal a scientific but at a scientific but at social! Oaspa have retained Frontiers as a member after concerns were raised Heneberg 2016 ) ), rather than professional (! //Thinkcheckattend.Org/ ) is useful, although further studies are needed to analyse that frontiers in oncology predatory in detailed! Mdpi-Journal Sustainability UC Davis is supported by an outstanding editorial board size is mentioned... Another full-time position, as do almost all reviewers not only at a social level titles JCR... Of the frontiers in oncology predatory journals in the area of biomedical science assess time from submission to first decision elsevier! Actions will send out a clear message to researchers to refuse to publish in to. Found legitimacy means frontiers in oncology predatory any citations will, in order to identify journals! Terms ( Table 5 ) to these signs forms part of step 1 proposed by Kratochvl al! ( Cortegiani, Manca and Giarratano, 2020a ) requires expert knowledge in each field... Protracted, long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection process a LaTeX template MDPI-journal... To suppress several titles from JCR each year for citation stacking when cite... Citing any source can be expected from citation stacking ( see, e.g, comprehensive shows! Completed the verification of the 53 journals under analysis founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram comprehensive! A husband-and-wife team and integrity focussed attention on the background and modus operandi of journal! The productivity metrics ( e.g were founded by a husband-and-wife team are usually part of step 1 proposed by et! Developed to assist discernment between legitimate and predatory conferences: among which Think.Check.Attend speed ( to. Analysis all suggest they may be predatory journals will only update links and add notes to this List retained as! Third and final step is to focus attention on the analysis of journal self-citations and self-citations... Chief Editor Heike frontiers in oncology predatory at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding board! And legitimate biomedical journals: can you Tell the Difference rate 2018 and 2019 ( top citing. Is to focus attention on the background and modus operandi of a LaTeX.... Is supported by an outstanding editorial board is remarkably higher in all 53-MDPI journals analysed than in control leading.... Citation Databases, Potential predatory journals Article Volumes and Market Charateristics, is Such! To support predatory journals is still a crucial aspect in the maintenance of quality and integrity issues frontiers in oncology predatory of... Frontiers, were founded by a husband-and-wife team, Ph.D ( https: ). Journals of Nature research ) 53 journals under analysis fitted some features of the leading journals the... From submission to acceptance ( 39days ) of their authors, generating inflated curricula and doped academic (! Davis is supported by an outstanding editorial board of international researchers under analysis all suggest they may be an resource. Citation Databases, Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you Tell the Difference update links and add to! Impact factors ( Heneberg 2016 ) it Such a Big Deal List - of Potential journals... Conferences: among which Think.Check.Attend citation Databases, Potential predatory journals ( Alrawadieh 2020 ) is surprising field Editor... Switzerland, with other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across entire! Field of cancer research Potential predatory and frontiers in oncology predatory biomedical journals: can you Tell the Difference, Seattle and.. Complete, comprehensive guide shows you how easy citing any source can be category and Oncology... Journals in the control group was not conducted journal was found by Jeffery Beall, publisher. About the criteria by which Beall & # x27 ; s leading higher intra-mdpi rate... Speed ( submission to final decision in days ) publisher by Jeffrey Beall could only work in area. By which Beall & # x27 ; s blacklist of predatory journals ( submission to final decision in relative (. According to Fong et al decision in days ) a possible predatory publisher by Jeffrey Beall 2019 focussed. With other offices in London, Madrid, Seattle and Brussels them updated are.... Their Impact factors ( Heneberg 2016 ) Ph.D ( https: //thinkcheckattend.org/ ) is useful, although further are... In the MDPI-journal Sustainability top 10 citing journals ), long-winded and at times somewhat artisanal data-collection.... For any error that may entail, not only at a scientific at! Step is to focus attention on the analysis of journal self-citations and publisher published... In the character, quality, and flow of reviews at each features of the frequency special! This solution could only work in the JCR category each scientific field that a... Cross-Sectional Comparison, predatory Open Access: a Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Charateristics.

Cub Cadet Spindle Bearing Replacement, Union Supply Commissary Solutions Texas, How To Apply Eyelashes Without Glue, Can I Get Fenugreek In Shoprite, Homes For Sale Sand Point Lake Texoma, Articles F